|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
1
   |
Posted - 2016.02.02 20:20:26 -
[1] - Quote
A few reasons why I won't vote for Tora:
1) A while back he declared war on my corporation on behalf of Loyal & Company. During the WD (unless I was flying a bathtub and jumped into 10 Marmites) they would run every time. Now they are at war with Loyal & Company.
2) I paid Tora 600m ISK for a week-long WD. The results were laughable.
3) Tora Bushido wrote:Running for CSM you do as a person, not a character you play in Eve. In real life I help people, in
Eve I want to be evil. Don't mix them up when you vote, as the real life player wants be in the CSM.
I don't think the two are so different. I'm not saying that a "pirate" in EO is a bank robber in RL, but it's part of your personality.
Vote for someone that will improve HS.
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 20:55:15 -
[2] - Quote
The whole tear shtick is pretty tired. I'd hardly say that my saying he was a waste of money is crying. He wasn't effective acting for me or against me (as evidenced by his crumbling alliance).
Vote for whomever you wish, but would you care to make a wager on the side?
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2016.02.02 21:21:32 -
[3] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Reluctant Deity wrote:The whole tear shtick is pretty tired. I'd hardly say that my saying he was a waste of money is crying. He wasn't effective acting for me or against me (as evidenced by his crumbling alliance).
Vote for whomever you wish, but would you care to make a wager on the side?
Why would I want to bet on the outcome of the CSM election? I just want to hear what Tora has to say. I don't care about your petty, in-game dealings with this candidate or any other. If he crossed you, beat you, made you sad or whatever, it has no bearing on what Tora can bring to the table as a CSM member. Please save your pouting for other threads more appropriate to such sentiments. This one is about what experience and platform Tora can offer to the community. If you have nothing to offer but innuendo and sore feelings, it might be best to just remain silent.
You want me to be silent while you prop him up? That's rich.
His in game behavior, good or bad has complete bearing here. If he failed to properly execute a WD that I paid for how can I expect him to do what he says as a member of the CSM.
Your argument is null and void sir.
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2016.02.03 16:28:29 -
[4] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:What I am saying is, both sides should have options in Eve to do damage to the others side, IF they put enough effort in it.
You are so misguided. Your so-called carebears have no desire to "do damage" to anyone.
That is so two dimensional and near-sighted of you.
The non pvp players have no desire to hurt others. They just want to play the game in their own way. To create is something you just don't understand. You force your way of gameplay onto others and think it's funny to be destructive.
Like most criminals, you're too lazy to work for what want. It's just easier (and second nature) to take it from someone who did.
And now you're asking carebears to vote for you...not gonna happen.
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2016.02.03 19:54:15 -
[5] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:1) Ganking can also be used to get revenge and industrial warfare for example.
Really? How?
An industrial pilot is strolling through HS in a freighter when a 30-man fleet of -10's descend on him (after 15-60 minutes of being bumped by a Machariel) and destroy his ship and probably his pod.
You think he can (with no pvp skills) go track down all 30 pilots and gank them one at a time?
THAT'S RIDICULOUS!
*No one believes that you're going to try and fix the ganker favored mechanics.
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2016.02.03 20:53:54 -
[6] - Quote
Tora, honestly that argument has gotten so old. You are saying that HS isn't safe so get over it, but you want us to vote for you so you can change something that you don't have a problem with in the first place.
Pick a side.
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2016.02.04 03:03:46 -
[7] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:I have always picked the side of Eve Online's balanced content. You get the most fun, when both sides have equal opportunities. Currently I think attackers have more then the defenders. This is what I want to rebalance.
There you go again limiting Eve to two sides. Do you live in a society where there are only two sides? I doubt it.
You say, "DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !".
I say, "Defend the weak, for together we are stronger".
|
Reluctant Deity
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2016.02.04 15:48:20 -
[8] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:You know, your argument might have more weight behind it if you chose to post with your main, instead of hiding behind a 'consequenceless' alt.
Funny, to this day many people don't believe that William Shakespeare wrote all those great plays.
To post on my main would mean an instant declaration of war from the marshmallows.
|
Reluctant Deity
6
|
Posted - 2016.02.04 22:00:03 -
[9] - Quote
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
In real life I agree with this. In a game where people are know to be extremely petty, not so much.
But hey, keep propping up your homies by trying to shoot down valid concerns.
Anyway, is there any proof of the CSM actually changing anything that the player base has asked for?
And by player base, I mean across the board.
~A very small group of players drown out the voices of the masses~
|
Reluctant Deity
6
|
Posted - 2016.02.04 23:07:53 -
[10] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:It's fantastic that you compare yourself to Shakespeare, and it's at this point that you lose any and all credibility that you might've had.
You missed that one by a mile friend.
I was merely saying that the content is what should be weighed.
"To be or not to be, that is the question." 
~A very small group of players drown out the voices of the masses~
|
|
|
Reluctant Deity
8
|
Posted - 2016.02.05 17:14:41 -
[11] - Quote
At least bring back the criteria that a pilot has to have bad sec status before you can place a bounty on him/her. Perhaps have another mechanic for placing a "hit" on someone.
Bounty: an amount of money given to someone as a reward for catching a criminal
To put a big red, "WANTED" on someone implies that they've committed a criminal act.
~A very small group of players drown out the voice of the masses~
|
Reluctant Deity
9
|
Posted - 2016.02.11 12:34:22 -
[12] - Quote
Like it or not, your gameplay reflects your character(rl).
"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter."
~Blaise Pascal~
|
|
|
| |
|